Protocolo de enfermagem no implante de valva aórtica transcateter: um direcionamento para o cuidado / Nursing protocol in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: care guideline

Objective: To validate a nursing care protocol by specialist nurses, contributing to the care delivered to patients undergoing percutaneous valve replacement. Methods: This cross-sectional, prospective, quantitative study adopted the Content Validity Index (CVI) to verify level of agreement regarding this protocol's total set of items. Results: The CVI obtained for each item of the protocol, verified using a validation instrument, was greater than the minimum required that is 0.80, on average. Conclusion: The development of a protocol intended to guide care provided to patients who have undergone TAVI, improves patient safety and minimizes health problems, so that the implementation of specific strategies for the development of actions performed by nurses is essential.

Objetivo: Validar un protocolo de cuidados de enfermería por enfermeros especialistas, contribuyendo para la práctica asistencial del paciente sometido al cambio de válvula percutánea. Métodos: Se trata de un estudio metodológico, transversal y prospectivo, con abordaje cuantitativo, que empleó el Índice de Validez de Contenido (CVI) para verificar el nivel de concordancia en el conjunto total de ítems del instrumento del protocolo. Resultados: Después de la verificación con el CVI para cada ítem del instrumento de validación del protocolo, los valores obtenidos en relación a todos los ítems del protocolo, quedaron con los valores, en media, mayores que el mínimo para el CVI, que es arriba de 0,80. Conclusión: El desarrollo de un protocolo de cuidados dirigido para los pacientes sometidos a TAVI, posibilita el aumento de la seguridad del paciente minimiza los daños a la salud, siendo un factor esencial en la implementación de estrategias específicas para el desarrollo de acciones desempeñadas por el enfermero.

Objetivo: Validar um protocolo de cuidados de enfermagem realizado por enfermeiros especialistas, contribuindo para a prática assistencial do paciente submetido à troca valvar percutânea. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo metodológico, transversal e prospectivo, com abordagem quantitativa, que empregou o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo (IVC) para verificar o nível de concordância no conjunto total de itens do instrumento do protocolo. Resultados: Após a verificação com o IVC, para cada item do instrumento de validação do protocolo, os valores obtidos em relação a todos os itens ficaram, em média, maiores que o mínimo para o IVC, que é acima de 0,80. Conclusão: O desenvolvimento de um protocolo de cuidados, voltado para os pacientes submetidos ao TAVI, possibilita o aumento da segurança destes e minimização dos agravos à saúde, sendo um fator essencial na implementação de estratégias específicas nas ações desempenhadas pelo enfermeiro.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Morbidity and Mortality-Related Factors: a 5-Year Experience in Brazil / Implante de Válvula Aórtica por Cateter e Seus Fatores de Morbimortalidade em Experiência de 5 Anos no Brasil

Abstract Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has become an option for high-surgical-risk patients with aortic valve disease. Objective: To evaluate the in-hospital and one-year follow-up outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods: Prospective cohort study of transcatheter aortic valve implantation cases from July 2009 to February 2015. Analysis of clinical and procedural variables, correlating them with in-hospital and one-year mortality. Results: A total of 136 patients with a mean age of 83 years (80-87) underwent heart valve implantation; of these, 49% were women, 131 (96.3%) had aortic stenosis, one (0.7%) had aortic regurgitation and four (2.9%) had prosthetic valve dysfunction. NYHA functional class was III or IV in 129 cases (94.8%). The baseline orifice area was 0.67 ± 0.17 cm2 and the mean left ventricular-aortic pressure gradient was 47.3±18.2 mmHg, with an STS score of 9.3% (4.8%-22.3%). The prostheses implanted were self-expanding in 97% of cases. Perioperative mortality was 1.5%; 30-day mortality, 5.9%; in-hospital mortality, 8.1%; and one-year mortality, 15.5%. Blood transfusion (relative risk of 54; p = 0.0003) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (relative risk of 5.3; p = 0.036) were predictive of in-hospital mortality. Peak C-reactive protein (relative risk of 1.8; p = 0.013) and blood transfusion (relative risk of 8.3; p = 0.0009) were predictive of 1-year mortality. At 30 days, 97% of patients were in NYHA functional class I/II; at one year, this figure reached 96%. Conclusion: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed with a high success rate and low mortality. Blood transfusion was associated with higher in-hospital and one-year mortality. Peak C-reactive protein was associated with one-year mortality.

Resumo Fundamento: O implante de válvula aórtica por cateter tornou-se uma opção para pacientes com doença valvar aórtica de elevado risco cirúrgico. Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados dos seguimentos intra-hospitalar e de até 1 ano do implante de válvula aórtica por cateter. Métodos: Estudo de coorte prospectiva de casos de implante de válvula aórtica por cateter entre julho de 2009 e fevereiro de 2015. Análise de variáveis clínicas e do procedimento, correlacionando com mortalidade intra-hospitalar e de 1 ano. Resultados: Foram submetidos ao implante 136 pacientes, com média de idade de 83 (80-87) anos, sendo 49% mulheres, 131 (96,3%) deles com estenose aórtica, um (0,7%) com insuficiência aórtica e quatro (2,9%) com disfunção de prótese. A classe funcional da NYHA foi III ou IV em 129 (94,8%) casos. A área valvar inicial foi 0,67 ± 0,17 cm2 e o gradiente ventrículo esquerdo-aorta médio de 47,3 ± 18,2 mmHg, com STS de 9,3% (4,8%-22,3%). As próteses implantadas eram autoexpansíveis em 97% dos casos. A mortalidade peroperatória em 1,5% dos casos; em 30 dias em 5,9%; intra-hospitalar em 8,1%; e após 1 ano em 15,5% dos casos. A hemotransfusão (risco relativo de 54; p = 0,0003) e a hipertensão arterial pulmonar (risco relativo de 5,3; p = 0,036) foram preditoras de mortalidade hospitalar; e a proteína C-reativa pico (risco relativo de 1,8; p = 0,013) e a hemotransfusão (risco relativo de 8,3; p = 0,0009) de mortalidade em 1 ano. Aos 30 dias, 97% dos pacientes estavam em classe NYHA I/II e, em 1 ano, o número chegou a 96%. Conclusão: O implante de válvula aórtica por cateter foi realizado com alto índice de sucesso e baixa mortalidade. A hemotransfusão associou-se com maior mortalidade hospitalar e de 1 ano. Proteína C-reativa pico se associou com a mortalidade de 1 ano.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Morbidity and Mortality-Related Factors: a 5-Year Experience in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has become an option for high-surgical-risk patients with aortic valve disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in-hospital and one-year follow-up outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of transcatheter aortic valve implantation cases from July 2009 to February 2015. Analysis of clinical and procedural variables, correlating them with in-hospital and one-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with a mean age of 83 years (80-87) underwent heart valve implantation; of these, 49% were women, 131 (96.3%) had aortic stenosis, one (0.7%) had aortic regurgitation and four (2.9%) had prosthetic valve dysfunction. NYHA functional class was III or IV in 129 cases (94.8%). The baseline orifice area was 0.67 ± 0.17 cm2 and the mean left ventricular-aortic pressure gradient was 47.3±18.2 mmHg, with an STS score of 9.3% (4.8%-22.3%). The prostheses implanted were self-expanding in 97% of cases. Perioperative mortality was 1.5%; 30-day mortality, 5.9%; in-hospital mortality, 8.1%; and one-year mortality, 15.5%. Blood transfusion (relative risk of 54; p = 0.0003) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (relative risk of 5.3; p = 0.036) were predictive of in-hospital mortality. Peak C-reactive protein (relative risk of 1.8; p = 0.013) and blood transfusion (relative risk of 8.3; p = 0.0009) were predictive of 1-year mortality. At 30 days, 97% of patients were in NYHA functional class I/II; at one year, this figure reached 96%. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed with a high success rate and low mortality. Blood transfusion was associated with higher in-hospital and one-year mortality. Peak C-reactive protein was associated with one-year mortality.